Crowdsourcingã¢â‚¬â€harnessing the Masses to Advance Health and Medicine a Systematic Review

Review

. 2014 Jan;29(one):187-203.

doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2536-8. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

Crowdsourcing--harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review

Affiliations

  • PMID: 23843021
  • PMCID: PMC3889976
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2536-viii

Complimentary PMC article

Review

Crowdsourcing--harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review

Benjamin L Ranard  et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan .

Gratuitous PMC article

Abstract

Objective: Crowdsourcing inquiry allows investigators to engage thousands of people to provide either data or data assay. However, prior work has not documented the employ of crowdsourcing in health and medical enquiry. We sought to systematically review the literature to draw the telescopic of crowdsourcing in health inquiry and to create a taxonomy to characterize by uses of this methodology for health and medical research.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL through March 2013.

Study eligibility criteria: Primary peer-reviewed literature that used crowdsourcing for health enquiry.

Report appraisal and synthesis methods: Two authors independently screened studies and abstracted information, including demographics of the oversupply engaged and approaches to crowdsourcing.

Results: 20-1 health-related studies utilizing crowdsourcing met eligibility criteria. 4 singled-out types of crowdsourcing tasks were identified: problem solving, data processing, surveillance/monitoring, and surveying. These studies collectively engaged a crowd of >136,395 people, yet few studies reported demographics of the oversupply. Only one (v %) reported age, sex, and race statistics, and vii (33 %) reported at least one of these descriptors. Most reports included information on crowdsourcing logistics such every bit the length of crowdsourcing (north = eighteen, 86 %) and time to consummate crowdsourcing task (north = 15, 71 %). All articles (n = 21, 100 %) reported employing some method for validating or improving the quality of data reported from the oversupply.

Limitations: Greyness literature not searched and only a sample of online survey articles included.

Conclusions and implications of central findings: Utilizing crowdsourcing tin meliorate the quality, toll, and speed of a research projection while engaging large segments of the public and creating novel scientific discipline. Standardized guidelines are needed on crowdsourcing metrics that should exist collected and reported to provide clarity and comparability in methods.

Figures

Figure 1.
Effigy ane.

Results of the systematic literature search for health-related crowdsourcing studies. This effigy shows the results of the systematic literature search for primary peer-reviewed articles that used crowdsourcing for health research.

Figure 2.
Effigy ii.

Crowdsourcing framework and categories.

Similar articles

  • Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.

    Créquit P, Mansouri One thousand, Benchoufi M, Vivot A, Ravaud P. Créquit P, et al. J Med Cyberspace Res. 2018 May xv;xx(5):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9330. J Med Cyberspace Res. 2018. PMID: 29764795 Free PMC article.

  • An evaluation of Cochrane Oversupply found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials.

    Noel-Storr A, Dooley G, Elliott J, Steele East, Shemilt I, Mavergames C, Wisniewski S, McDonald S, Murano M, Glanville J, Foxlee R, Beecher D, Ware J, Thomas J. Noel-Storr A, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:130-139. doi: ten.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 January eighteen. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 33476769

  • Suicidal Ideation.

    Harmer B, Lee S, Duong TVH, Saadabadi A. Harmer B, et al. 2021 Aug 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–. 2021 Aug 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–. PMID: 33351435 Free Books & Documents.

  • Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review.

    Wang C, Han L, Stein G, Twenty-four hours S, Bien-Gund C, Mathews A, Ong JJ, Zhao PZ, Wei SF, Walker J, Chou R, Lee A, Chen A, Bayus B, Tucker JD. Wang C, et al. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 January 20;ix(1):viii. doi: ten.1186/s40249-020-0622-9. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020. PMID: 31959234 Gratuitous PMC article.

  • The awarding of crowdsourcing approaches to cancer research: a systematic review.

    Lee YJ, Arida JA, Donovan HS. Lee YJ, et al. Cancer Med. 2017 Nov;6(11):2595-2605. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1165. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Cancer Med. 2017. PMID: 28960834 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by 95 articles

  • Changes in Physical Activeness and Depressive Symptoms During COVID-xix Lockdown: United states Adult Age Groups.

    Kim ACH, Du J, Andrew DPS. Kim ACH, et al. Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 17;13:769930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.769930. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35250713 Free PMC article.

  • Crowdsourced Community Support Resources Among Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pilot Feasibility Study.

    Agarwal AK, Southwick L, Schneider R, Pelullo A, Ortiz R, Klinger EV, Gonzales RE, Rosin R, Merchant RM. Agarwal AK, et al. JMIR Ment Wellness. 2022 Feb 23;ix(ii):e31909. doi: 10.2196/31909. JMIR Ment Wellness. 2022. PMID: 35037886 Free PMC article.

  • Articulation international consensus statement on crowdsourcing claiming contests in wellness and medicine: results of a modified Delphi procedure.

    Han L, Tang W, Ritchwood T, Day S, Wei S, Bao H, John R, Kpokiri E, Mathanga D, Awor P, Juban N, Castro-Arroyave D, Ambil V, Xiong Y, Oppong E, Tucker J. Han L, et al. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 5;eleven(11):e048699. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34740928 Gratuitous PMC article.

  • Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

    Zorko D, McNally JD, Rochwerg B, Pinto North, Couban R, O'Hearn Chiliad, Choong K. Zorko D, et al. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 1;10(10):e30582. doi: ten.2196/30582. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021. PMID: 34596576 Gratis PMC article.

  • PONT: A Protocol for Online Neuropsychological Testing.

    Saban Westward, Ivry RB. Saban W, et al. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Oct 1;33(eleven):2413-2425. doi: ten.1162/jocn_a_01767. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34347867 Costless PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  • Full Text Sources

  • Other Literature Sources

  • Research Materials

  • Miscellaneous

burkeagnight.blogspot.com

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23843021/

0 Response to "Crowdsourcingã¢â‚¬â€harnessing the Masses to Advance Health and Medicine a Systematic Review"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel